LLMEvaluation & SafetyUpdated 2026.04.28

RAG Evaluation

Also known asRAG 품질 평가RagasTruLens

In one line

RAG evaluation is the practice of measuring a retrieval-augmented system's quality across both stages — retrieval and generation — so you can see why an answer went wrong, not just that it did.

Going deeper

RAG evaluation breaks the quality question into stage-specific metrics rather than a single thumbs-up/down. Typical signals include retrieval-side context precision and recall, generation-side faithfulness (does the answer match the cited sources?) and answer relevance to the query. Ragas, TruLens and DeepEval are common open-source toolkits that standardise these.

Two angles for marketers. First, when an in-house RAG assistant degrades, you can see whether retrieval missed the right document or generation ignored the right source — a much faster path to a fix. Second, the same metrics tell you how 'citation-friendly' your own content is from a GEO standpoint: weak retrieval scores often map to weak chunking and weak structure.

The mature pattern combines automated RAG evaluation with LLM-as-a-Judge for scale, and human review on flagged regressions. Looking at a single composite score hides too much; tracking retrieval and generation metrics separately is what actually reveals the root cause.

Related terms

How does your brand show up in AI answers?

Villion measures how your brand appears across ChatGPT, Perplexity and AI Overviews, then automates the work that lifts citation rate and share of voice.

Get a free audit